EPYC 7352 vs V-Series V160
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 304 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.92 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD V-Series | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.21 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 December 2010 (15 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,350 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of V-Series V160 and EPYC 7352: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 74 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 15,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V160 and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | S1 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V160 and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V160 and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V160 and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V160 and EPYC 7352.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2010 | 7 August 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 155 Watt |
V-Series V160 has 520% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7352, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD V-Series V160 and AMD EPYC 7352. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that V-Series V160 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
