Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs V-Series V140
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2608L v4 outperforms V-Series V140 by a whopping 1588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3416 | 1516 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.75 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD V-Series | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.05 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 4 October 2010 (15 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $363 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
V-Series V140 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | 2 × 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246.24 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V140 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | S1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
V-Series V140 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon E5-2608L v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 4.22 |
| Recency | 4 October 2010 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 50 Watt |
Xeon E5-2608L v4 has a 1588% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 924% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD V-Series V140 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
