Celeron T1600 vs V-Series V140
Aggregate performance score
Celeron T1600 outperforms V-Series V140 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3420 | 3344 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.98 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | no data |
| Release date | 4 October 2010 (15 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V140 and Celeron T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.075V-1.175V |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V140 and Celeron T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
V-Series V140 and Celeron T1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron T1600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron T1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| Recency | 4 October 2010 | 1 October 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 35 Watt |
V-Series V140 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron T1600, on the other hand, has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, and 1362.9% lower power consumption.
The Intel Celeron T1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD V-Series V140 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
