Celeron M 743 vs V-Series V140

VS

Aggregate performance score

V-Series V140
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.27
+80%
Celeron M 743
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.15

V-Series V140 outperforms Celeron M 743 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31393321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD V-SeriesIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.021.42
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1BGA965
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

V-Series V140 0.27
+80%
Celeron M 743 0.15

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

V-Series V140 1913
+44.4%
Celeron M 743 1324

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

V-Series V140 990
+70.2%
Celeron M 743 582

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

V-Series V140 68.3
+78.3%
Celeron M 743 121.8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.15
Recency 4 October 2010 1 September 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

V-Series V140 has a 80% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron M 743, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The V-Series V140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD V-Series V140
V-Series V140
Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 47 votes

Rate V-Series V140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about V-Series V140 or Celeron M 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.