Celeron M 743 vs V-Series V140

General info
Technical specs
Compatibility
Technologies
Memory
Benchmarks
Advantages and disadvantages
Vote
Similar processor comparisons
User Ratings
Questions and comments

General info

Comparing V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD V-Series	Intel Celeron M
Architecture codename	Champlain (2010−2011)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	4 October 2010 (13 years ago)	1 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$107
Current price	$18.47	no data

Technical specs

V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Boost clock speed	2.3 GHz	1.3 GHz
Bus support	3200 MHz	800 MHz
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
Chip lithography	45 nm	45 nm
Die size	no data	107 mm²
Number of transistors	no data	410 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	S1	BGA965
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Integrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

V-Series V140 1913
+44.4%

Celeron M 743 1324

V-Series V140 outperforms Celeron M 743 by 44% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

V-Series V140 990
+70.2%

Celeron M 743 582

V-Series V140 outperforms Celeron M 743 by 70% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

V-Series V140 68.3
+78.3%

Celeron M 743 121.8

Celeron M 743 outperforms V-Series V140 by 78% in wPrime 32.