Celeron D 352 vs V-Series V140
Aggregate performance score
V-Series V140 outperforms Celeron D 352 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3447 | 3588 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.42 | 0.08 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Cedar Mill (2006) |
| Release date | 4 October 2010 (15 years ago) | May 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V140 and Celeron D 352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 109 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 125 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.25V-1.325V |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V140 and Celeron D 352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 86 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron D 352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
V-Series V140 and Celeron D 352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron D 352 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Celeron D 352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 86 Watt |
V-Series V140 has a 56.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 244% lower power consumption.
The AMD V-Series V140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron D 352 in performance tests.
Be aware that V-Series V140 is a notebook processor while Celeron D 352 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
