Atom N435 vs V-Series V140
Aggregate performance score
V-Series V140 outperforms Atom N435 by a whopping 178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3447 | 3706 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD V-Series | Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.42 | 0.76 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 4 October 2010 (15 years ago) | 2 June 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V140 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V140 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.09 |
| Recency | 4 October 2010 | 2 June 2011 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 5 Watt |
V-Series V140 has a 177.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Atom N435, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.
The AMD V-Series V140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N435 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
