EPYC Embedded 8224P vs V-Series V120
Aggregate performance score
EPYC Embedded 8224P outperforms V-Series V120 by a whopping 11529% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3450 | 223 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.41 | 7.36 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V120 and EPYC Embedded 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.55 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,750 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V120 and EPYC Embedded 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 160 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V120 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V120 and EPYC Embedded 8224P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V120 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V120 and EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.24 | 27.91 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 160 Watt |
V-Series V120 has 540% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 8224P, on the other hand, has a 11529.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD V-Series V120 in performance tests.
Be aware that V-Series V120 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8224P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
