Athlon 300U vs V-Series V120

VS

Aggregate performance score

V-Series V120
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.27
Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.43
+800%

Athlon 300U outperforms V-Series V120 by a whopping 800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31321760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD V-SeriesAMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.0215.33
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache128 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1FP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

V-Series V120 0.27
Athlon 300U 2.43
+800%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

V-Series V120 1874
Athlon 300U 3968
+112%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

V-Series V120 1874
Athlon 300U 8724
+366%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

V-Series V120 69.3
Athlon 300U 15.44
+349%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 2.43
Recency 12 May 2010 6 January 2019
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon 300U has a 800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the V-Series V120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V120 and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD V-Series V120
V-Series V120
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 64 votes

Rate V-Series V120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 459 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about V-Series V120 or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.