Celeron B840 vs V-Series V105

V-Series V105 V-Series V120 V-Series V140 V-Series V160
VS
Core i3-2310M Core i3-2330M Core i3-2350M Core i5-2410M Core i5-2430M Core i5-2450M Core i5-2520M Core i5-2540M Core i7-2630QM Core i7-2640M Core i7-2670QM Pentium B960

Contents

V-Series V105 V-Series V105
Celeron B840 Celeron B840

Primary details

Comparing V-Series V105 and Celeron B840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD V-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data1.65
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

V-Series V105 and Celeron B840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate2000 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data19
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on V-Series V105 and Celeron B840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron B840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
FMA-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

V-Series V105 and Celeron B840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron B840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron B840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of V-Series V105 and Celeron B840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron B840.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary

Recency 12 May 2010 1 July 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 35 Watt

V-Series V105 has 288.9% lower power consumption.

Celeron B840, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between V-Series V105 and Celeron B840. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V105 and Celeron B840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD V-Series V105
V-Series V105
Intel Celeron B840
Celeron B840
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

V-Series V105 V Series V105
vs
Mobile A A110 Mobile A A110
Celeron B840 Celeron B840
vs
i3-2340UE Core i3 2340UE
V-Series V105 V Series V105
vs
Atom Z620 Atom Z620
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
i7-6660U Core i7 6660U
Mobile Pentium 4 520 Mobile Pentium 4 520
vs
A4-5050 A4 5050
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
i5-4220Y Core i5 4220Y
Mobile Sempron 2800+ Mobile Sempron 2800+
vs
Pentium M 1.50 Pentium M 1.50
Pentium M 705 Pentium M 705
vs
A4-5050 A4 5050
V-Series V105 V Series V105
vs
Celeron N3160 Celeron N3160
V-Series V105 V Series V105
vs
i3-330E Core i3 330E
V-Series V105 V Series V105
vs
Atom x5-Z8350 Atom x5 Z8350
Celeron M 360 Celeron M 360
vs
A4-5050 A4 5050
Pentium M 753 Pentium M 753
vs
A4-5050 A4 5050

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 11 votes

Rate V-Series V105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 17 votes

Rate Celeron B840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about V-Series V105 or Celeron B840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.