EPYC 7302 vs UHD Graphics 630
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 382 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 9.23 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.21 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Gen9.5 | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | no data | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $978 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.35 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 30 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 74 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 15,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7302.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
EPYC 7302 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD EPYC 7302. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7302 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
