Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52
Core 2 Duo T6670
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28742880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion UltraIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.421.42
Architecture codenameGriffin (2008−2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1g2PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.1-1.125Vno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 0.52
Core 2 Duo T6670 0.52

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1965
Core 2 Duo T6670 2365
+20.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 3840
Core 2 Duo T6670 4430
+15.4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1618
Core 2 Duo T6670 1850
+14.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 34.9
+49.1%
Core 2 Duo T6670 52.04

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Core 2 Duo T6670 has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core 2 Duo T6670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Core 2 Duo T6670

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 or Core 2 Duo T6670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.