Pentium Dual T4200 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53
Pentium Dual Core T4200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.72
+35.8%

Pentium Dual Core T4200 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28692696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion UltraIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency1.431.95
Architecture codenameGriffin (2008−2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2P
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.1-1.125Vno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
AMTno data+

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 0.53
Pentium Dual T4200 0.72
+35.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1965
Pentium Dual T4200 2013
+2.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 3840
+1%
Pentium Dual T4200 3801

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1618
Pentium Dual T4200 1636
+1.1%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 34.9
+12.5%
Pentium Dual T4200 39.27

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.72
Recency 3 June 2008 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Pentium Dual T4200 has a 35.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium Dual Core T4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Pentium Dual Core T4200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200
Pentium Dual Core T4200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 127 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 or Pentium Dual Core T4200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.