Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 by a whopping 19508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3063 | 1 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.25 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.62 | 12.08 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 4 June 2008 (17 years ago) | 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $11,700 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 96 |
| Threads | 2 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 12x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 99,780 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1g2 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 136 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.51 | 100.00 |
| Recency | 4 June 2008 | 23 July 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 96 |
| Threads | 2 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 has 900% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, on the other hand, has a 19507.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
