Pentium N3510 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Aggregate performance score
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 outperforms Pentium N3510 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2853 | 2862 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | 1.53 | 6.99 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 December 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $161 |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 224 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1g2 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3L-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.56 | 0.55 |
| Recency | 4 June 2008 | 1 December 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Pentium N3510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Pentium N3510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
