E-350 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
+74.1%

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 outperforms E-350 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29303148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion UltraAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.271.42
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FT1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 0.47
+74.1%
E-350 0.27

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 207
+95.3%
E-350 106

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 417
+129%
E-350 182

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 1886
+79.9%
E-350 1049

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 3615
+80.3%
E-350 2005

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 1610
+57.7%
E-350 1021

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.27
Recency 4 June 2008 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 has a 74.1% higher aggregate performance score.

E-350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 36 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 396 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.