Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8160 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 by a whopping 3762% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2924 | 336 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.41 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 1.39 | 11.45 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 25 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,702 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 85 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | S1g2 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.47 | 18.15 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 25 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 150 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 has 368.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8160, on the other hand, has a 3761.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Platinum 8160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8160 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon Platinum 8160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
