Phenom II X2 550 vs Turion X2 RM-75
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2568 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.55 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Callisto (2009−2010) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | November 2009 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $133 |
| Current price | $21 | $21 (0.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus support | 4000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 258 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Phenom II X2 550 outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by 73% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 80 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X2 550 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-75 and Phenom II X2 550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
