Mobile Pentium 4 552 vs Turion Neo X2 L625
Aggregate performance score
Turion Neo X2 L625 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 552 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3393 | 3480 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Neo | Mobile Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 0.59 | 0.09 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 1 October 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Pentium 4 552 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Pentium 4 552 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | ASB1 BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 88 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Pentium 4 552. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.19 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 88 Watt |
Turion Neo X2 L625 has a 31.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 388.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD Turion Neo X2 L625 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 552 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
