Celeron U3400 vs Turion Neo X2 L625
Aggregate performance score
Celeron U3400 outperforms Turion Neo X2 L625 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3141 | 3092 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Neo | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 1.42 | 1.68 |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | Westmere (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 24 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 0.07 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 1.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 1 × 2.5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 8 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 382 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | ASB1 BGA | BGA1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| FMA | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 12.799 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 500 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| Recency | 1 October 2009 | 24 May 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
Celeron U3400 has a 18.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron U3400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion Neo X2 L625 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
