Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Turion II Ultra M660

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M660
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64
Core 2 Duo T8300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.93
+45.3%

Core 2 Duo T8300 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27592511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II UltraIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.732.51
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$241

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache2 MB3 MB
L3 cacheno data3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinBGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Ultra M660 0.64
Core 2 Duo T8300 0.93
+45.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II Ultra M660 2278
Core 2 Duo T8300 2626
+15.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion II Ultra M660 4403
Core 2 Duo T8300 4837
+9.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.93
Recency 10 September 2009 10 January 2008

Turion II Ultra M660 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Core 2 Duo T8300, on the other hand, has a 45.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Core 2 Duo T8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M660 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M660 and Core 2 Duo T8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M660
Turion II Ultra M660
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 265 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Ultra M660 or Core 2 Duo T8300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.