A4-7300 vs Turion II Ultra M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M620
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46

A4-7300 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32032816
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Turion II Ultrano data
Power efficiency0.560.57
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date10 September 2009 (16 years ago)August 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data96 KB
L2 cache2 MB1024 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinFM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow++
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8470D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion II Ultra M620 0.46
A4-7300 0.88
+91.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Turion II Ultra M620 814
A4-7300 1543
+89.6%
Samples: 232

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion II Ultra M620 297
A4-7300 370
+24.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion II Ultra M620 550
A4-7300 567
+3.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.88
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Turion II Ultra M620 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

A4-7300, on the other hand, has a 91.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD A4-7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II Ultra M620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II Ultra M620 is a notebook processor while A4-7300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M620
Turion II Ultra M620
AMD A4-7300
A4-7300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 39 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 106 votes

Rate A4-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion II Ultra M620 and A4-7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.