i7-1068G7 vs Turion II P520
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-1068G7 outperforms Turion II P520 by a whopping 864% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3185 | 1455 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Turion II | Intel Core i7 |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | 7.26 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (16 years ago) | 1 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Turion II P520 and Core i7-1068G7: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 4 × 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II P520 and Core i7-1068G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | S1 (S1g4) | Intel BGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II P520 and Core i7-1068G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II P520 and Core i7-1068G7 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II P520 and Core i7-1068G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 59.732 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.50 | 4.82 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 August 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Turion II P520 has 12% lower power consumption.
i7-1068G7, on the other hand, has a 864% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core i7-1068G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II P520 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
