Ryzen 3 7320U vs i7-1068G7
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1121 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 71 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) |
| Release date | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus type | OPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 23 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1440 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.732 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.43 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 1 August 2019 | 20 September 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-1068G7 has 90.5% faster integrated GPU.
Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-1068G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
