Phenom X3 8600 vs Turion II Neo K625
Primary details
Comparing Turion II Neo K625 and Phenom X3 8600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2640 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Turion II Neo | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.76 |
| Architecture codename | Geneva (2010) | Toliman (2008) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | March 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion II Neo K625 and Phenom X3 8600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 285 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Neo K625 and Phenom X3 8600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Phenom X3 8600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Turion II Neo K625 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
Phenom X3 8600, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Turion II Neo K625 and Phenom X3 8600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Turion II Neo K625 is a notebook processor while Phenom X3 8600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Neo K625 and Phenom X3 8600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
