V-Series V140 vs Turion II M520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II M520
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
+107%
V-Series V140
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.27

Turion II M520 outperforms V-Series V140 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II M520 and V-Series V140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28263125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIAMD V-Series
Power efficiency1.511.02
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II M520 and V-Series V140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II M520 and V-Series V140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M520 and V-Series V140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
PowerNow+-
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II M520 and V-Series V140 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II M520 and V-Series V140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II M520 0.56
+107%
V-Series V140 0.27

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II M520 1955
+2.2%
V-Series V140 1913

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion II M520 1839
+85.9%
V-Series V140 990

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion II M520 33.6
+103%
V-Series V140 68.3

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Turion II M520 1
+110%
V-Series V140 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.27
Recency 10 September 2009 4 October 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Turion II M520 has a 107.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

V-Series V140, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Turion II M520 is our recommended choice as it beats the V-Series V140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II M520 and V-Series V140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II M520
Turion II M520
AMD V-Series V140
V-Series V140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 91 vote

Rate Turion II M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 37 votes

Rate V-Series V140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II M520 or V-Series V140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.