Atom N2600 vs Turion II M500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Turion II M500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.49
+145%

Turion II M500 outperforms Atom N2600 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30963445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.592.11
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date10 September 2009 (16 years ago)1 December 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$47

Detailed specifications

Turion II M500 and Atom N2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II M500 and Atom N2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M500 and Atom N2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Turion II M500 and Atom N2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II M500 and Atom N2600 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II M500 and Atom N2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2.44 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion II M500 0.49
+145%
Atom N2600 0.20

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II M500 1865
+245%
Atom N2600 541

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion II M500 3591
+135%
Atom N2600 1528

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion II M500 1756
+116%
Atom N2600 812

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion II M500 34.76
+89.9%
Atom N2600 66

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.20
Recency 10 September 2009 1 December 2011
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

Turion II M500 has a 145% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom N2600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Turion II M500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N2600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II M500
Turion II M500
Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 46 votes

Rate Turion II M500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 211 votes

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion II M500 and Atom N2600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.