Mobile Sempron M100 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Aggregate performance score
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3191 | 3462 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 0.51 | 0.34 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad/Tyler (2007) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 147 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 154 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35/31 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 90/65 nm, 1.075 | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 0.20 |
| Recency | 4 May 2007 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 has a 110% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
The AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
