Celeron 430 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-60
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
+156%
Celeron 430
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 outperforms Celeron 430 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29183247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turion 64no data
Architecture codenameTrinidad/Tyler (2007)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$50

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size147 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C60 °C
Number of transistors154 Million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35/31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions90/65 nm, 1.075no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 0.46
+156%
Celeron 430 0.18

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 184
+18.7%
Celeron 430 155

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 346
+116%
Celeron 430 160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.18
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 has a 155.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron 430, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is a notebook processor while Celeron 430 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 105 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 159 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-60 or Celeron 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.