Mobile Sempron 3500+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-58
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.40
+150%
Mobile Sempron 3500+
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 outperforms Mobile Sempron 3500+ by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30103290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency1.220.61
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Keene
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt25 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 0.40
+150%
Mobile Sempron 3500+ 0.16

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 1339
+90.2%
Mobile Sempron 3500+ 704

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 25 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Sempron 3500+, on the other hand, has 24% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3500+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Mobile Sempron 3500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Turion 64 X2 TL-58
AMD Mobile Sempron 3500+
Mobile Sempron 3500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-58 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-58 or Mobile Sempron 3500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.