Celeron E3300 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Aggregate performance score
Celeron E3300 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-58 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3011 | 2893 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.83 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.22 | 0.73 |
| Architecture codename | Tyler (2007−2009) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 30 August 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $70 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 0.50 |
| Recency | 4 May 2007 | 30 August 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 has 109.7% lower power consumption.
Celeron E3300, on the other hand, has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron E3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is a notebook processor while Celeron E3300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Celeron E3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
