Athlon II Neo K325 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Aggregate performance score
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 outperforms Athlon II Neo K325 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3294 | 3421 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | AMD Athlon II Neo |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Tyler (2007−2009) | Geneva (2010) |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II Neo K325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II Neo K325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II Neo K325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0 |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II Neo K325 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II Neo K325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.36 | 0.25 |
| Recency | 4 May 2007 | 12 May 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 has a 44% higher aggregate performance score.
Athlon II Neo K325, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II Neo K325 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
