Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-52 by a whopping 4479% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3064 | 441 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | 52.63 |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad (2006−2007) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 17 May 2006 (18 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 28 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 15.57 |
| Recency | 17 May 2006 | 3 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has a 4479.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 10.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
