Xeon Gold 5520+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5520+ outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-50 by a whopping 11174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3389 | 126 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 23.78 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.42 | 7.20 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Taylor (2006) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | 17 May 2006 (19 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $154 | $1,640 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 5520+ has 237700% better value for money than Turion 64 X2 TL-50.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Xeon Gold 5520+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 52.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 147 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 154 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Xeon Gold 5520+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | S1 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Xeon Gold 5520+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE(1,2,3), AMD64 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Xeon Gold 5520+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Xeon Gold 5520+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Xeon Gold 5520+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Xeon Gold 5520+.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.31 | 34.95 |
| Recency | 17 May 2006 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 205 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 has 561.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5520+, on the other hand, has a 11174.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5520+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5520+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
