Pentium Dual T3200 vs Turion 64 MT-32

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 MT-32
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16
Pentium Dual Core T3200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.38
+138%

Pentium Dual Core T3200 outperforms Turion 64 MT-32 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35783296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency0.270.46
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Merom (2006−2008)
Release dateMarch 2005 (20 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MT-32 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.79 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size125 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors114 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MT-32 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-32 and Pentium Dual Core T3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.38
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Turion 64 MT-32 has 40% lower power consumption.

Pentium Dual T3200, on the other hand, has a 137.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 MT-32 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MT-32
Turion 64 MT-32
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
Pentium Dual Core T3200

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 MT-32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 95 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 MT-32 and Pentium Dual Core T3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.