Xeon Platinum 8180 vs Turion 64 MT-30

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 MT-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.18
Xeon Platinum 8180
2017
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
23.88
+13167%

Xeon Platinum 8180 outperforms Turion 64 MT-30 by a whopping 13167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3310221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.94
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesTurion 64Intel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency0.6911.09
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,009

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Number of transistors114 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
Socket754FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data768 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 23.88
Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 205 Watt

Turion 64 MT-30 has 720% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8180, on the other hand, has a 13166.7% higher aggregate performance score, 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8180 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-30 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 MT-30 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8180 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MT-30
Turion 64 MT-30
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
Xeon Platinum 8180

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 MT-30 and Xeon Platinum 8180, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.