Atom N2850 vs Turion 64 MT-30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3493not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.27no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release dateMarch 2005 (20 years ago)5 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MT-30 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MT-30 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-30 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

Atom N2850 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Turion 64 MT-30 and Intel Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MT-30
Turion 64 MT-30
Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 MT-30 and Atom N2850, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.