Atom 330 vs Turion 64 ML-44

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-44
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.26
+13%
Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23

Turion 64 ML-44 outperforms Atom 330 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31493189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.702.72
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$43

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128 KB112 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size125 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors114 million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket754PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-44 0.26
+13%
Atom 330 0.23

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 ML-44 940
+14%
Atom 330 825

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion 64 ML-44 70
+66.4%
Atom 330 116.45

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.23
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 8 Watt

Turion 64 ML-44 has a 13% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 ML-44 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 330 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-44 and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-44
Turion 64 ML-44
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-44 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-44 or Atom 330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.