Xeon Gold 6526Y vs Celeron M 585

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 585
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.43
Xeon Gold 6526Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 195 Watt
28.97
+6637%

Xeon Gold 6526Y outperforms Celeron M 585 by a whopping 6637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2977155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.09
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.3114.06
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data37.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size143 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 585 0.43
Xeon Gold 6526Y 28.97
+6637%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 585 678
Xeon Gold 6526Y 46025
+6688%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 28.97
Recency 20 August 2008 14 December 2023
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 195 Watt

Celeron M 585 has 529% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6526Y, on the other hand, has a 6637.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6526Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 585 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 585 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6526Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 585 and Xeon Gold 6526Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 585
Celeron M 585
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y
Xeon Gold 6526Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M 585 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6526Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 585 or Xeon Gold 6526Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.