Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Turion 64 ML-40
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Turion 64 ML-40 by a whopping 17710% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3513 | 124 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Turion 64 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | 0.24 | 5.37 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | June 2005 (20 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Turion 64 ML-40 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 35 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-40 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | sWRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 35.62 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 280 Watt |
Turion 64 ML-40 has 700% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, on the other hand, has a 17710% higher aggregate performance score, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 ML-40 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 ML-40 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
