EPYC 7443 vs Turion 64 ML-40
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7443 outperforms Turion 64 ML-40 by a whopping 16110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3513 | 168 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 14.08 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Turion 64 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.24 | 6.84 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | June 2005 (20 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,010 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Turion 64 ML-40 and EPYC 7443: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.85 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 28.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-40 and EPYC 7443 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 754 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and EPYC 7443. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and EPYC 7443 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and EPYC 7443. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and EPYC 7443.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 32.42 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Turion 64 ML-40 has 471% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7443, on the other hand, has a 16110% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7443 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 ML-40 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 ML-40 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7443 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
