Pentium M 705 vs Turion 64 ML-40

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-40
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.21
+40%
Pentium M 705
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.15

Turion 64 ML-40 outperforms Pentium M 705 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-40 and Pentium M 705 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32103307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Pentium M
Power efficiency0.570.58
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Banias (2003)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-40 and Pentium M 705 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.956V-1.484V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-40 and Pentium M 705 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754H-PBGA479, PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Pentium M 705. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-40 and Pentium M 705 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Pentium M 705 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.15
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 24 Watt

Turion 64 ML-40 has a 40% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 705, on the other hand, has 45.8% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 ML-40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 705 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-40 and Pentium M 705, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-40
Turion 64 ML-40
Intel Pentium M 705
Pentium M 705

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 ML-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium M 705 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-40 or Pentium M 705, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.