Ambiq Apollo 3.5 vs Turion 64 ML-30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
ML-28 ML-30 ML-34 ML-37 ML-40 ML-42 ML-44 MT-30 MT-32 MT-34 MT-37 MT-40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Contents

Share:
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Ambiq Apollo 3.5

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3563not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64no data
DesignerAMDno data
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Cortex-M4F
Release dateMarch 2005 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-30 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1/1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm40 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-30 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)1 MBno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-

Pros & cons summary

Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm

Ambiq Apollo 3.5 has a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD Turion 64 ML-30 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Core 2 Solo SU3500 Core 2 Solo SU3500
Ambiq Apollo 3.5
vs
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 Ryzen AI 9 HX 170
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 380 Celeron M 380
Core 2 Solo SU3500 2 Solo SU3500
vs
i3-2377M i3 2377M
Core 2 Solo SU3500 2 Solo SU3500
vs
Xeon Gold 6530 Gold 6530
Pentium 4 P4 3.0 Pentium 4 P4 3.0
vs
Pentium 4 HT Extreme Edition 3.40 Pentium 4 HT Extreme Edition 3.40
Pentium 4 P4 3.0 Pentium 4 P4 3.0
vs
Ultra 5 225F Ultra 5 225F
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Athlon 64 2700+ Athlon 64 2700+
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Ultra 7 265F Ultra 7 265F
Mobile Pentium 4 520 Mobile Pentium 4 520
vs
Ryzen 7 7730U Ryzen 7 7730U
Mobile Pentium 4 520 Mobile Pentium 4 520
vs
Xeon Platinum 8580 Platinum 8580
Mobile Pentium 4 518 Mobile Pentium 4 518
vs
GX-210JA GX 210JA
Mobile Pentium 4 518 Mobile Pentium 4 518
vs
Xeon Platinum 8592 Platinum 8592

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 75 votes

Rate Ambiq Apollo 3.5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 ML-30 and Ambiq Apollo 3.5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.