Atom E3826 vs Turion 64 ML-28

Place in the ranking	3295	3247
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Turion 64	Atom
Power efficiency	0.43	2.57
Architecture codename	Lancaster (2005−2006)	Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date	June 2005 (19 years ago)	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-28 and Atom E3826 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	1.47 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
Die size	125 mm²	no data
Number of transistors	114 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-28 and Atom E3826 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	754	Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Atom E3826. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Atom E3826. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD Graphics

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-28 0.16

Atom E3826 0.19
+18.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion 64 ML-28 254

Atom E3826 304
+19.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.16	0.19
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	7 Watt

Atom E3826 has a 18.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Atom E3826 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-28 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-28 and Atom E3826, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.