Core 2 Solo U2200 vs Turion 64 MK-38
Aggregate performance score
Turion 64 MK-38 outperforms Core 2 Solo U2200 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3412 | 3463 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | Core 2 Solo |
| Power efficiency | 0.29 | 1.38 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Richmond | Merom-L (2007) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 MK-38 and Core 2 Solo U2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.8V-1V |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 MK-38 and Core 2 Solo U2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MK-38 and Core 2 Solo U2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion 64 MK-38 and Core 2 Solo U2200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MK-38 and Core 2 Solo U2200 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 5 Watt |
Turion 64 MK-38 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Core 2 Solo U2200, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 520% lower power consumption.
The AMD Turion 64 MK-38 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo U2200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
