Celeron J4125 vs Steam Deck OLED APU

VS

Aggregate performance score

Steam Deck OLED APU
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.61
+148%
Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86

Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms Celeron J4125 by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12901984
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.39
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency29.0917.60
Architecture codenameVan Gogh (Custom) (2023)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date9 November 2023 (1 year ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache256 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography6 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU (1000 - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Steam Deck OLED APU 4.61
+148%
Celeron J4125 1.86

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Steam Deck OLED APU 689
+184%
Celeron J4125 243

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Steam Deck OLED APU 4457
+220%
Celeron J4125 1394

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Steam Deck OLED APU 1486
+227%
Celeron J4125 455

7-Zip

Steam Deck OLED APU 19684
+163%
Celeron J4125 7494

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.61 1.86
Recency 9 November 2023 4 November 2019
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Steam Deck OLED APU has a 147.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J4125, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The Steam Deck OLED APU is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Be aware that Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook processor while Celeron J4125 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron J4125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
Steam Deck OLED APU
Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Steam Deck OLED APU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1514 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Steam Deck OLED APU or Celeron J4125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.