Athlon II X4 640 vs Steam Deck OLED APU
Aggregate performance score
Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by a whopping 226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Steam Deck OLED APU and Athlon II X4 640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1304 | 2215 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.92 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 28.96 | 1.40 |
| Architecture codename | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 9 November 2023 (1 year ago) | 11 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $80 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Steam Deck OLED APU and Athlon II X4 640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 169 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Steam Deck OLED APU and Athlon II X4 640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Athlon II X4 640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Athlon II X4 640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU (1000 - 1600 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Athlon II X4 640.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.59 | 1.41 |
| Recency | 9 November 2023 | 11 May 2010 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Steam Deck OLED APU has a 225.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
The Steam Deck OLED APU is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 640 in performance tests.
Be aware that Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 640 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Steam Deck OLED APU and Athlon II X4 640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
