Phenom X4 9850 (125W) vs Sempron 3800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 3800+ and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameManila (2001−2006)Agena (2007−2008)
Release dateOctober 2006 (18 years ago)July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$21no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 3800+ and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size103 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistors81 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 3800+ and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt125 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 3800+ and Phenom X4 9850 (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 125 Watt

Sempron 3800+ has 101.6% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9850 (125W), on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 3800+ and Phenom X4 9850 (125W). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3800+ and Phenom X4 9850 (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 3800+
Sempron 3800+
AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W)
Phenom X4 9850 (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Sempron 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9850 (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 3800+ or Phenom X4 9850 (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.