Celeron 887E vs Sempron 3600+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3431not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.14no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameManila (2001−2006)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateMay 2006 (19 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$12no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 3600+ and Celeron 887E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache256K512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size103 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors81 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 3600+ and Celeron 887E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3600+ and Celeron 887E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 3600+ and Celeron 887E are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3600+ and Celeron 887E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 887E has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 264.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Sempron 3600+ and Intel Celeron 887E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Sempron 3600+ is a desktop processor while Celeron 887E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 3600+
Sempron 3600+
Intel Celeron 887E
Celeron 887E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 20 votes

Rate Sempron 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 887E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Sempron 3600+ and Celeron 887E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.