Mobile Sempron 3200+ vs Sempron 3400+
Aggregate performance score
Sempron 3400+ outperforms Mobile Sempron 3200+ by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3490 | 3539 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 0.12 | 0.24 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Palermo (2001−2005) | Keene |
| Release date | 1 October 2005 (19 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3400+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | no data |
| Die size | 103 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3400+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 25 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3400+ and Mobile Sempron 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 25 Watt |
Sempron 3400+ has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score.
Mobile Sempron 3200+, on the other hand, has 148% lower power consumption.
The AMD Sempron 3400+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Sempron 3200+ in performance tests.
Note that Sempron 3400+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Sempron 3200+ is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
