Xeon D-1736NT vs Sempron 3300+
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 686 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.86 |
| Architecture codename | Palermo (2001−2005) | no data |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 15 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 69 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 67 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 67 Watt |
Sempron 3300+ has 8.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-1736NT, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron 3300+ is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1736NT is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3300+ and Xeon D-1736NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
